Where God gave victory over 1 MILLION Cushites

It's not everyday you learn about a Bible story while seeing the exact place it happened!

My favorite part of Bet Guvrin/Maresha National Park was the ancient tel of Maresha. It wasn't a name I knew of from the Bible, and while I have read its story several times in the past, I didn't remember it. So it was like I was experiencing the story for the first time!

Settled in Joshua 15, the city was fortified by King Rehoboam in 2 Chronicles 11: 5-8. Today, the path at the top is actually not solely the chalky limestone the area is famous for, but the top of walls of the ancient city. On this beautiful spring-like day, the Judean hills glowed green, with bright red anemones waving at the sky, and the sun gave views that took my breath away.

The path below is not sand; its the top of the ancient city walls that Rehoboam fortified!

Then, came King Asa.

The year was 900 BC, and 2 Chronicles 14 tells the story of the son of Shishak in Cush (Ethiopia) sending an army of 1 MILLION Cushites (Ethiopians) against Judah. 

King Asa rode out to a valley in the lower Judean hills with an army of 580,000 and their chariots. Asa cried out to God and said, "'Lord, there is no one like you to help the powerless against the mighty. Help us, Lord our God, for ewe rely on you, and in your name we have come against this vast army. Lord, you are our God; do not let mere mortals prevail against you'"

The LORD struck down the Cushites before Asa and Juda. The Cushites fled, and Asa and his army pursued them as far as Gerar. Such a great number of Cushites fell that they could not recover; they were crushed before the LORD and his forces. The men of Judah carried off a large amount of plunder."

WOW! And, when you are standing on top of tel Maresha, the only place in the area where this could have happened is this one clearing below.

I have to say, sitting on top of that tel, walking on its walls, then hearing the reading of this story while looking at the valley and the beautiful Judean hills in a 360-degree view is can only be summed up in 1 word:

EPIC.

Next week, we'll talk about what's at the base of this tel!

Was Jesus here?

Last week, we started a series about Tabgha, an area on the north shore of the Galilee believed to be where Jesus called the disciples, preached the Sermon on the Mount, and where tradition observes Him multiplying the bread and fish for 5,000+ men, women, and children.

But there's one more thing believed to have happened in this area, and 1 more church dedicated to it: Jesus cooking the fish on the rock for Peter, charging Him to feed His sheep in John 21.

This was a new place for me to visit. If you aren't on a tour bus, you need to leave your vehicle near the Church of the Multiplication and walk back to the street, walk about 1 block and then you enter the beautiful gardens:

The church itself is built on a large rock that tradition says is where Jesus stood and called to the disciples in John 21. 

Nearby is the harbor:

The inside is simple, with the altar being the rest of the rock:

Can we talk about the windows, though? WOW!

That's it for the tour. It's a simple place, and it can't be proven Jesus stood on that rock exactly. Like I said last week, we know He was in that area of the Galilee, so it could be it. Or it could not. What matters is that this story is real, and we're seeing a possible location for it. 

One more thing... I spotted this sign on the way out and thought it was a beautiful poem:

See you next week!

Where did Jesus feed the 5,000+?

Last week, we talked about the Jesus' miracle of feeding the 5000+ and where it is observed in the Galilee, the Church of the Multiplication. But where did this miracle actually happen?

On a sunny spring Friday in the Galilee, I think I saw the place from above:

The feeding of the 5000+ is in all 4 of the Gospels, one of the only miracles that is in all of them. Both Matthew and Mark say that Jesus and the disciples withdrew to a solitary place. John's account mentions a hill or mountainside, which I'll respond to later. But I want to shine a light on Luke's account:

"Then He took them with him and they withdrew by themselves to a town called Bethsaida, but the crowds learned about it and followed him. He welcomed them and spoke to them about the kingdom of God and healed those who needed healing. 

Late in the afternoon, the 12 came to him and said, 'Send the crowd away so that they can go to the surrounding villages and countryside and find food and lodging, because we are in a remote place here.'"

Luke 9:10-13

So, according to Luke, this remote place was near Beit Zaida, the hometown of Peter, James, Andrew, and Philip. Luke also uses the word remote in the description. 

The area needed to be big enough for all 5000+ people to sit down, and both Matthew and Mark say there was plenty of room to do so. 

In this photo, taken from Tel Mutilla, you can see the shores of the Galilee. On the shore is a small clump of trees. RIGHT THERE is El Araj, where excavations are currently going on. Last summer, it was concluded that this was Beit Zaida, not the place 2 km (and up a mountain) away.

And stretching beyond that is a plain. Can you see it in the picture? It goes on...

and on (by the way, do you see Gamla in the seam of the mountains in the distance?)

And on!

We saw this place from beside the war memorial at Tel Mutilla, which is up on a hill... not to mention all the hills across the plain (any of those could fit John's description). And while the spectacular view did not fit into 1 camera angle, I tried:

Does this photo (or the 3 above it combined) look like a big enough place with enough grass for around 20,000 people to sit? Does it look desolate/remote? We already know it is beside Beit Zaida. It's also a lot closer to the Golan (literally, it is the Golan now, which is nearer to the Decapolis)

WOW.

We couldn't go to El Araj that day because the rains had made the road impassable. But this view gave a perspective like nothing else could have. I was speechless and overwhelmed. Because, it doesn't take too much imagination to see it all happen right there. 

And then, if you turn to right, you'll see the Galilee spread out before you... which, if you follow the story, the water right in front is likely where Jesus walked on water. 

SERIOUSLY!

And on a beautiful spring Friday, there was beauty all around.

Celebrating the miracle of the Feeding of the 5,000+

Not far from Capernaum is beautiful area of the north shore of the Sea of Galilee. The land here is descends from the hills around the lake and is very rocky, unsuitable for farming. Because of 7 springs that flow into the lake there, trees grow close to the shore and schools of fish are attracted to that area. 

It's believed that this is where Jesus called the disciples, farther up the hill is where He gave the Sermon on the Mount, and fed the 5,000+, somewhere nearby is also where He cooked the fish in John 21. 

Back in 2017, I shared about my trip to the Church of the Multiplication, and my question about how Jesus was heard, both when He fed the multitude, but also during the Sermon on the Mount. by 15,000+ people. In 2018, I found the answer! In 2022, I toured 2 other possible sites for the Sermon on the Mount: Ein Nur (possible) and Horns of Hattin (HIGHLY unlikely).

But I haven't been back to Tabgha since 2017. So I finally got to visit again this past spring. It was a beautiful day to visit 2 sites that while not exact, are close in locations to where these Biblical accounts happened!

Tabgha's name is hard for us to pronounce as English speakers. It's a corruption of the Greek word Eptapegon (7 springs). The Hebrew name for this means the same: Ein Sheva.

Bible Places says Josephus refers to this area as the "well of Capernaum" and says there is evidence of it being an ancient harbor that is only visible when the water level is low.

It is here where there are 2 churches to commemorate 2 specific events: The Church of the Multiplication and the Church of the Primacy of Peter.

This week we'll talk about the Church of the Multiplication!

This church is most well-known for the stone and mosaic that are under the altar, but the building itself is beautiful too:

As I spoke about here, the church itself has been rebuilt on its original foundation after the original (built in several centuries after Jesus ascended into Heaven) was burned down. 

Inside is very simple, in the Byzantine style. But there are some unique features, like beautiful mosaic floors:

(on the wall you can see the original walls and the later ones on top)

and windows that actually aren't glass but stone (alabaster):

And finally, the famous mosaic of the loaves and fishes and the altar, below which is the stone it's said Jesus sat on while He taught the people at the Feeding of the 5000+:

The mosaic is so famous, it's used all over the world as a symbol for this story. It's also on so many different kinds of souvenirs—magnets, paintings, tile, etc.

The funny thing is that it's actually inaccurate. According to Bible Places, the fish in the mosaic have 2 dorsal fins—something none of the fish in the Galilee have! Also, Bible Places points out that the Biblical text says Jesus was near Bet Tsaida, which is on the other side of Capernaum. So this is likely not the place for this miracle. Maybe He was on that rock, maybe not. Either way, it's on the north side of the Galilee, and we know this is where Jesus spent 80% of those 3 ministry years. 

And honestly... when I went back to look for my original blog post on this church, I couldn't find it. Why? I didn't do one because what I cared most about was being in nature and seeing the place Jesus did this, not a rock with a church all around it built almost 400 years after it happened. That's because I connect with God most in nature. That being said, I appreciated being there back then (I think I was cranky from jet lag at that point), and this time I did as well. It was nice to visit again before going to the other church on the property—which I had never been to.

In 2 weeks we'll visit the Church of the Primacy of Peter, but next week is a special surprise!

The Mystery at Magdala

I finally got to go to Magdala with a tour guide, and wow, this place is even more incredible than I first realized! 

Obviously nothing beats the fact that Jesus was there, in that first century B.C. synagogue—one of only 7 that have been discovered. If fact, it boggles my mind to even think about it. 

But what I didn't know is why this site is so well preserved, and why the main street next to it is barricaded with broken columns.

My tour guide pointed out to us that there is only 1 column still partially standing in the ruins of the synagogue. And how does this correlate with the blocked main street? Why?

The answer lies in the Great Revolt of 67 AD, around the same time that Gamla fell. Magdala was one of the few cities that stood up to the Romans as they made their campaign from the north through the south—all the way to Jerusalem. At some point, the inhabitants made a previously unthinkable decision. To protect their town, and the synagogue, they removed the columns from the synagogue and used them to barricade the entrance to their town. They also covered over the synagogue to keep it from being destroyed by the Romans.

Magdala was destroyed, but because of the forethought of the Madgalenes, the synagogue was preserved until 2009 AD, when its remains were discovered just 30 centimeters below the surface. 

WOW!!!

But that's not the mystery I wanted to share with you. The mystery is this:

While a replica of the Magdala stone is in the synagogue, the original is in the lobby of the hotel. (AMAZING!!!) Because this synagogue is from 1st Century AD, before the destruction of the 2nd Temple, we know that its decoration was fashioned after the Temple. This is one of the earliest known depictions of the menorah from the Temple. Here it stands on a base, which matches the image of the Menorah on the Arch of Titus in Rome.

(picture mine)

This is intriguing, because other images of the menorah don't show a base, but a 3-point stand. For instance, here is one from the Talmudic village of ancient Katzrin in the Golan:

And here, from the Museum in Katzrin. This relief also dates back to the Talmudic (Byzantine) era:

These carvings are from only a few centuries after Jesus. So which is correct? There has appeared to be a discrepancy between the Arch of Titus and the earliest depictions of the menorah that have been found—until the Magdala stone. The fact that it has a base might not be creative license; it might be a carving of the actual menorah, which is the ancient symbol for Israel (not the Star of David).

Which is correct?

Could it be that the menorah for the Temple is in Rome (the Vatican) after all? What do you think?